By: Anggara Putra)
As the year draws to a close, social and political dynamics have once again heated up with the emergence of discourse regarding the potential return of the “212 Reunion” in several regions and major cities across Indonesia. This issue has not only sparked public debate but also raised alarms among those who value the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). In this situation, the main narrative that must be emphasized is the prioritization of security stability, public safety, and the nation’s ideological sovereignty above the interests of specific groups.
Pejuang Nusantara Indonesia Bersatu (PNIB), through its Chairman AR Waluyo Wasis Nugroho—popularly known as Gus Wal—has issued a strong warning for Indonesia to remain firm and highly vigilant. Gus Wal stressed that the planned 212 Reunion should not be viewed merely as a casual gathering or social event. He believes that the activity has increasingly transformed into a platform for consolidation among groups aligned with transnational ideologies, supporters of the caliphate movement, and sympathizers of terrorist networks.
PNIB highlighted the very real risk that the 212 Reunion could be exploited by remnants of banned organizations. Past experiences provide clear lessons that large-scale gatherings under the 212 banner have often become a stage for speeches by individuals previously affiliated with the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) and Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI).
The public must be reminded that both FPI and HTI were officially disbanded by the Indonesian government through the Law on Mass Organizations (Perppu Ormas) and lawful court rulings. Their dissolution was not arbitrary, but a constitutional measure taken because their ideology and activities were proven to be incompatible with Pancasila and posed threats to public order, safety, and security.
In his statement, Gus Wal emphasized that the event is not merely a reunion but a suspected consolidation forum with hidden subversive agendas that could endanger national security and the safety of the people. He argued that allowing such activities would be equivalent to providing space for ideologies that seek to undermine the nation’s foundational values.
Indonesia is not alone in confronting radicalism disguised as religious activism. PNIB encouraged the public and the government to take note of other countries that have taken firm measures against similar groups. The narrative that firm government action constitutes “criminalization” is misleading, as global facts indicate otherwise.
Gus Wal cited examples of decisive actions taken by other nations. Malaysia, he noted, restricts the activities of Wahhabi groups due to concerns over social unrest and fragmentation. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia imposes severe penalties—including the death penalty—on individuals advocating for a caliphate or engaging in acts of terrorism that threaten national security.
At the global level, the United States has adopted strategic measures by banning the Muslim Brotherhood, citing its links to international terrorism networks and its role in inspiring extremism, radicalism, and politically motivated religious terrorism.
Furthermore, Gus Wal explained that these countries’ approaches may serve as references for Indonesia, underscoring that vigilance against transnational ideological movements promoting caliphate systems and terrorism is not merely a local issue, but a global challenge requiring firm action.
Indonesia must not be complacent. Any movement that opens the door to the resurgence of caliphate narratives, radicalism, anarchy, extremism, and transnational political or terrorist networks represents an existential threat to the nation. Such groups are dangerous because their primary target is dismantling national unity and endangering the public.
Therefore, PNIB urged the government to ensure no legal or political loopholes can be exploited by groups affiliated with transnational organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood. Oversight must be intensified at all levels, including monitoring political entities that attempt to align themselves with destructive ideologies for short-term electoral gains.
Gus Wal also stated that Indonesia must learn from Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, the United States, and other countries that have taken firm actions to prevent the growth of extremist movements that threaten societal, national, and state integrity.
There must be zero tolerance for ideologies that contradict Pancasila. Annual events such as the 212 Reunion—closely associated with caliphate narratives and intolerance—must be addressed without compromise. The government, law enforcement agencies, Densus 88 Anti-Terror, the National Counterterrorism Agency (BNPT), the National Police, and the Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) must stand as the front line in rejecting the event wherever it may be held.
Firm action by the Indonesian government and law enforcement is a conditio sine qua non for safeguarding the dignity of Pancasila and the integrity of the NKRI. Coordination between Densus 88, BNPT, the National Police, and the TNI must be strengthened to ensure early detection and disruption of radical group consolidation.
PNIB concluded its statement by calling for national awareness and mobilization. All elements of society, government, and security institutions (Densus 88, BNPT, Police, TNI) must unite in heightening vigilance over public spaces vulnerable to infiltration.
The 212 Reunion is considered to carry high risks of being exploited by remnants of banned organizations such as HTI, FPI, Jamaah Ansharut Tauhid (JAT), and Jamaah Ansharut Daulah (JAD), which may attempt to resurface through mass consolidation efforts.
In closing, Gus Wal urged the government and law enforcement agencies—including Densus 88, BNPT, the National Police, and the TNI—to reject, prohibit, and disband the 212 Reunion wherever it is organized. He emphasized that for the safety of the nation, there can be no negotiation with parties attempting to undermine the NKRI.
Security stability is non-negotiable. Indonesia’s future must not be compromised by groups seeking to replace Pancasila with foreign ideologies that have repeatedly failed and been banned across the world.
*) Political Observer