Jakarta: The awarding of a state award to Indonesia’s second president, Suharto, has once again drawn public attention and sparked widespread discussion about how the nation interprets its history. Amidst the debate, this move can be seen as a sign of national maturity in viewing history more holistically and proportionally.
Indonesia has a long history marked not only by success but also by complex political, economic, and social dynamics. Acknowledging Suharto’s role in crucial phases of national development is part of a comprehensive view of history, without ignoring the critical notes that accompany it.
The Head of the Indonesian Ulema Council’s Fatwa Division, Asrorun Niam Sholeh, stated that a great nation is one that respects its leaders. He emphasized that the award is not merely symbolic but also serves as a momentum to strengthen national values and unity.
“Every deceased former president deserves to be recognized as a national hero. They fought and sacrificed while leading the country. The public should not harbor grudges or dwell on past mistakes, because no one is perfect,” said Asrorun.
Similarly, Culture Minister Fadli Zon stated that there was no evidence to suggest Suharto was involved in the 1965–1966 genocide. He argued that assessments of national figures should be based on objective data, not political stigma or vested interests.
“These accusations have never been proven legally or with valid historical facts,” he said.
Charles Gilbert, the Central Coordinator of the Indonesian Christian Student Executive Board (KSI), believes that Suharto succeeded in building a solid foundation for the nation’s progress. He organized the economy, strengthened national resilience, and built extensive infrastructure, the benefits of which are still felt today.
“Soeharto was the architect of national stability. Awarding him the title of National Hero is a form of historical justice,” said Charles.
During his more than three decades in power, Suharto led Indonesia through various development programs that laid the foundation for the nation’s economic and political stability. Under the New Order regime, Indonesia successfully reduced poverty, expanded access to basic education, built infrastructure, and strengthened food security through programs such as transmigration and rice self-sufficiency.
In an era of easily occurring political polarization, the nation’s ability to approach history with greater maturity is crucial. Viewing the past objectively allows society to build a healthier national dialogue, avoiding being trapped in a black-and-white dichotomy. Ultimately, the state’s tribute to Soeharto can serve as a momentum to reflect on the nation’s journey, strengthen historical reconciliation, and affirm that national maturity lies in the courage to face history honestly and proportionately.
The government’s decision to award the award can be interpreted as an attempt to reconcile with the past without erasing criticism of that period. This award is not a form of glorification, but rather an acknowledgment of the historical fact that Soeharto’s leadership had a significant influence on the direction of Indonesia’s development.