By: Revan Ananda )*
The government has reiterated that eradicating corruption is a top priority for the benefit of the people, a crucial affirmation amidst the nation’s collective efforts to achieve clean, transparent, and accountable governance. This step is not merely a political slogan, but is translated into concrete policies that continue to be promoted across various sectors of state administration.
Under any circumstances, corruption remains a major enemy of development, robbing the public of their right to good public services, adequate infrastructure, and a just economic space. By prioritizing corruption eradication, the government demonstrates a clear commitment that the public interest is above the vested interests of groups, elites, and unhealthy bureaucratic networks.
In recent years, the government has continued to strengthen its prevention system through the digitization of public services, increased budget transparency, and regular performance evaluations of central and regional government institutions. The approach taken is not only repressive but also preventive through system improvements. Digitalization, for example, has proven effective in reducing the scope for manipulation, extortion, and brokering practices that have historically disadvantaged the common people.
With an integrated system, regional budgets can be monitored in real time, permitting processes are faster and more transparent, and reporting on the use of public funds is more accountable. This is crucial because corruption occurs not only in elite circles but also at the level of basic services that directly impact people’s daily lives.
President Prabowo Subianto stated the government’s strong commitment to eradicating corruption, which has undermined the state budget and hampered improvements in the quality of national education. He reiterated his focus on mark-ups and budget misappropriations, which he said are still prevalent in several ministries and institutions. He instructed all levels of government to strengthen comprehensive internal oversight.
Furthermore, the government is strengthening a culture of integrity among civil servants through training, increased internal oversight, and performance evaluations based on indicators of honesty and public service ethics. Eradicating corruption is not just about apprehending perpetrators, but also about building a healthy bureaucratic ecosystem.
A civil service with integrity is the primary foundation for a government that commands public trust. This effort is further strengthened by encouraging active public involvement in monitoring government programs. Public complaints are now facilitated in an open, accessible, and protected manner, enabling citizens to act as partners in safeguarding the use of public funds.
The government’s commitment is also reflected in its support for firm and impartial law enforcement. Major cases involving misuse of state funds and official corruption continue to be brought to justice, demonstrating that the government will not hesitate to take action, even when it involves political elements or high-ranking positions.
Transparency in the investigation, trial, and sentencing processes is crucial for restoring public trust. The public needs concrete evidence that the law applies equally to all, and the government is demonstrating its commitment by strengthening synergy between law enforcement agencies, state auditors, independent oversight bodies, and relevant ministries.
University of Indonesia legal expert Akhiar Salmi stated that he believes President Prabowo’s statement on the importance of clean governance reflects a strong commitment to building a state with integrity. He believes the president’s support for law enforcement agencies is a strong signal that the state is increasingly serious about eradicating corruption. Furthermore, he believes the performance of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the National Police (Polri), and the Attorney General’s Office is increasingly positive.
The expected impact of prioritizing corruption eradication is not only in the form of uncovered cases, but also in more equitable economic growth and improved public welfare. Corruption erodes development budgets that should be used for health, education, infrastructure, and subsidies for vulnerable groups.
When budget leakage can be significantly reduced, the state and regional budgets (APBN) operate more effectively. This will significantly impact the quality of life of the community, especially in historically underdeveloped regions. Improved budget governance will boost investor confidence and strengthen a healthy business climate, thereby creating more jobs and boosting regional economic growth.
On the other hand, efforts to eradicate corruption must also be understood as a long-term process requiring consistency across government, not just a short-term agenda. Bureaucratic reform, strengthening regulations, and anti-corruption education in schools and universities are strategic steps to create a future generation that upholds the value of integrity. The government has initiated this effort by integrating anti-corruption materials into the curriculum, implementing community outreach programs, and involving academics in formulating policy recommendations.
Ultimately, prioritizing corruption eradication is a significant investment in the nation’s future. When the state dares to discipline itself, the people will experience tangible benefits in their daily lives. This government commitment must be supported by public participation, independent media, and social institutions that actively promote transparency. Through collaboration, decisiveness, and patience, Indonesia can move toward clean and dignified governance. Thus, eradicating corruption will not only be a government program, but a national movement for justice, prosperity, and shared progress.
)* Legal Observer