By: Andhika Utama )*
The concrete steps taken by the government and parliament in accelerating the discussion of the Draft Law on Asset Confiscation should be appreciated as a real form of the state’s commitment to strengthening the corruption eradication system and recovering state losses. This issue has long been a concern for the public and the legal community in Indonesia, given the weak legal framework governing the confiscation and seizure of assets resulting from crime, especially corruption.
The government of President Prabowo Subianto continues to be committed to eradicating corruption in Indonesia, and has expressed its support for the acceleration of the discussion and ratification of the Draft Law (RUU) on Asset Confiscation by the Indonesian House of Representatives. Amid the complexity of legal challenges and public distrust of law enforcement, the emergence of explicit support from President Prabowo Subianto for this bill is a breath of fresh air.
President Prabowo firmly supports the Asset Confiscation Bill and said that it is time for the state to have the authority to take back assets obtained from the proceeds of crime, without having to be bound by lengthy legal procedures that often hinder the recovery of state losses. The firm statement shows the president’s attitude that does not tolerate the practice of stealing state assets by a handful of elites or white-collar criminals.
This support was then welcomed positively by various groups, including parliament. Several members of the Indonesian House of Representatives, especially from Commission III, expressed their readiness and commitment to immediately discuss the bill. One of the supports came from the Golkar Party, which stated that they would be in line with the President’s direction in accelerating this legislative process. Member of the Indonesian House of Representatives from the Golkar Faction, Dave Laksono, said that his party was ready to fully support the discussion of this bill in parliament and emphasized the importance of cross-party cooperation in presenting regulations that are bold and in favor of the interests of the people.
The Asset Confiscation Bill is important because it provides a legal basis that allows the state to confiscate and seize assets resulting from crime, even though there has been no final criminal decision against the perpetrator. This model is known as non-conviction based asset forfeiture, which has long been used by various countries such as the United States, England, and Singapore.
In practice, this mechanism is very effective in preventing criminals from exploiting legal loopholes to hide or retain assets resulting from crime. However, Indonesia has not yet had a legal instrument that allows the full implementation of this mechanism.
However, this acceleration effort is certainly not without challenges. One of them is the concern of some parties that the implementation of asset confiscation without a criminal verdict could potentially violate the principle of the presumption of innocence or be misused by law enforcement. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the discussion of this bill is carried out carefully, transparently, and involves input from various groups, including legal experts, academics, civil society, and anti-corruption institutions.
Member of Commission III of the Indonesian House of Representatives, Soedeson Tandra emphasized the importance of accelerating the discussion and ratification of the Asset Confiscation Bill as a concrete step in strengthening the legal framework for eradicating corruption in Indonesia. The importance of caution in implementation so as not to cause abuse of power. In this context, the role of parliament is crucial. The Indonesian House of Representatives as a legislative institution must be able to bridge the interests of the state in enforcing the law with the protection of citizens’ rights guaranteed in the constitution. This regulation must not be drafted in a hurry without considering aspects of justice and accountability. The Asset Confiscation Bill is not only about accelerating confiscation, but also about ensuring that legal mechanisms continue to operate within the corridor of human rights.
Great hopes are now focused on real synergy between the government and the Indonesian House of Representatives. In recent years, the public has seen how weak our legal system is in recovering state losses. Many major cases such as BLBI, Jiwasraya, and Asabri have left deep wounds because the assets resulting from crimes have not been fully returned to the state treasury. The losses incurred reached trillions of rupiah and the state had difficulty recovering due to limited existing regulations. If this bill can be passed immediately and implemented properly, it will be a major breakthrough in the history of eradicating economic crime in Indonesia.
Support from anti-corruption institutions such as the KPK, PPATK, the Prosecutor’s Office, and the Police will also greatly determine the effectiveness of the implementation of this regulation. Without the readiness of law enforcement officers, the existence of progressive laws will be in vain. Therefore, in addition to discussing the substance of the law, the government and the DPR also need to prepare adequate human resources, budget, and monitoring systems so that the objectives of the law can be achieved.ri this bill can be achieved.
With all these dynamics, the steps taken by the government and parliament in accelerating the discussion of the Asset Confiscation Bill should receive wide appreciation. This is not just about presenting new regulations, but about presenting justice for the people, and giving a strong signal that the state is present to protect its wealth from thieves in ties. In the spirit of mutual cooperation, transparency, and siding with the people, this bill must be a national priority and passed in the near future.
)* Strategic Policy Observer
