The Public Must Reject the “Indonesia Gelap” Provocation, a Threat to National Security and Economic Stability
By: Astika Utami
In recent times, a dangerous and misleading narrative has resurfaced in the public sphere—namely, the “Indonesia Gelap” (Dark Indonesia) provocation, promoted by certain groups with questionable motives. This narrative is not only deceptive, but also highly detrimental to both national security and the country’s economic stability.
For this reason, the public must remain wise and firmly reject all forms of provocation that may divide the nation, undermine public trust in the state, and disrupt the country’s social and economic order.
The term “Indonesia Gelap” is not just a rhetorical phrase without impact. Behind it lies a calculated attempt to create confusion, spread pessimism, and incite public anger—especially during crucial moments in the nation’s social and political life.
Intelligence and security analyst Stanislaus Riyanta stated that the “Indonesia Gelap” narrative is very likely being exploited by groups seeking to delegitimize the government. The public must be more vigilant against efforts to manipulate public opinion, especially when these narratives are wrapped in dramatic, emotional language that distorts facts.
This narrative often surfaces during times of political, economic, or legal turbulence that demand national focus. As the country strives to maintain stability and recover post-pandemic—amid global challenges such as geopolitical tensions and economic pressures—such provocations only serve as counterproductive disruptions.
One direct consequence of spreading the “Indonesia Gelap” provocation is the disruption of national security. These types of narratives can trigger collective emotional responses and fuel unproductive, potentially anarchic mass actions. Such situations are extremely dangerous and can be exploited by actors—both domestic and foreign—who seek to weaken the country’s social defense systems.
As is well known, the spread of misleading and provocative information is a serious offense that can disturb public order. Therefore, it is crucial for all elements of the nation to work together in maintaining a clean and positive digital space. National security is a shared responsibility—not just the task of the government or security forces.
In today’s open-information era, provocations spread via social media and digital platforms can quickly go viral and shape public opinion, often before verified facts are even clarified.
Beyond being a security threat, the “Indonesia Gelap” provocation also poses serious economic consequences. Economic stability is closely tied to public trust—both from domestic communities and foreign investors. When pessimistic, hate-filled narratives are continuously pushed, the investment climate becomes unstable. Investors will think twice about placing their capital in an environment perceived as politically and socially uncertain.
At the same time, domestic businesses may also face operational setbacks due to fears of social unrest. This directly affects economic growth, job creation, and the general welfare of society.
It must be understood that building a nation is never easy. Despite facing various dynamics and limitations, the government continues to strive for progress across all sectors. Constructive criticism and public aspirations are both legitimate—and essential parts of democracy. However, it is crucial to differentiate between criticism and provocation.
Constructive criticism is based on data, delivered in a civilized manner, and aims to improve the current situation. In contrast, provocations such as “Indonesia Gelap” are born from destructive intent, often without basis, and seek to create chaos or delegitimize state institutions.
The public, as the true holders of sovereignty, must become increasingly intelligent and discerning. In this digital age, information literacy is crucial. Not everything that goes viral on social media is true. Not every emotional narrative is genuinely aimed at positive change.
Economist Fithra Faisal Hastiadi from the University of Indonesia stated that public trust is one of the most vital pillars of economic stability. The “Indonesia Gelap” narrative could negatively impact investor perception indexes on Indonesia. It is essential that the public avoids being provoked, as it could lead to a depreciation of the rupiah, declining purchasing power, and disruptions to the real sector.
Security and the economy are two core pillars of national resilience. When these pillars are threatened, the consequences can be far-reaching, affecting all aspects of citizens’ lives. The “Indonesia Gelap” provocation is a form of disinformation that endangers both pillars simultaneously. It not only spreads fear and unrest, but also seeks to erode public confidence in government institutions and democratic processes. If left unchecked, it could lead to long-term instability that harms every level of society.
Strengthening collaboration between the public, government, and all elements of the nation is essential to maintaining a healthy public sphere. Digital literacy education must be promoted continuously so that people become smart and selective in filtering information. The media also has a strategic role—not to act as a mouthpiece for provocation, but to serve as a guardian of balanced and factual information.
Rejecting the “Indonesia Gelap” provocation does not mean turning a blind eye to the country’s shortcomings. On the contrary, it is a form of collective responsibility to ensure the nation stays on the right path. We all play a role in making sure Indonesia continues to grow as a peaceful, safe, and prosperous nation.
*) The author is a contributor to the Pertiwi Institute
