Fighting Radicalism in Every Line of Life
By: Miati Kartika *
Radicalism is a latent threat in national life . He can target anyone alone without looking at the background behind . All parties are expected to increase their vigilance to stem the spread of radicalism .
Increase vigilance will be the spread of radicalism in various lines is a priority primary . Therefore , understanding and action that may lead to the perpetrators tend to toward terrorism would harm themselves their own and others. Government and society do not be careless again in overseeing the spread of the ideology of anti-Pancasila this is .
Radicalism which is now eroded by time began to show its fangs . The existence of an understanding that is identical to Islam is slowly developing rapidly following the times. Radicalism seems capable of transforming according to what it occupies . Trick each victim to be a puppet for the survival of groups of extremists in the outcome there .
In ontological , said radical is actually inclined to the direction of neutral . Radical comes from the word radix which means ” at all ” or down to its roots . In the Dictionary of the Indonesian (KBBI V), in the terminology of the word radical has some perception that is , the first is to be a fundamental , to respect the principle . second , too loudly demanding changes . Third , move forward in thinking and acting . While visits In epistemology , said radical departure to the interpretation of the thoughts and actions for a change .
Corresponding provisions of Article 43A of Law No. 5/2018 on Combating Acts of Criminal Terrorism (Law 5/2018) states , that the efforts of prevention of acts of criminal terrorism carried out by the government which is based on the principle of the protection of the right to basic human and the principle of prudence .
This means that , in doing the effort of prevention that the government should always be cautious (prudent) in order to provide protection of the law against the rights of individuals or groups of people who allegedly exposed to radicalism . The attitude of caution it also should have the size and standard of protection of the right to basic human . It is intended that prevention efforts do not create victims and new stigma against individuals and groups of people exposed to radicalism .
On the effort of prevention is , of Law No. 5/2018 has been giving guidelines are quite clear and detailed . The following law states that prevention efforts must be carried out through national preparedness , counter- radicalization and also de-radicalization . The intent and purpose the efforts of prevention are among others is , unity preparedness nationwide .
Efforts prevention through a system of preparedness nationwide is a condition ready alert to anticipate the entry into force of acts of criminal terrorism through a process that is integrated , well-planned , systematic , and continuous . Activities through preparedness nationwide this can be done through empowerment of the community , an increase in the ability of the apparatus , the protection and improvement of means of infrastructure , the development of studies on terrorism , including the mapping of regions prone to understand radical terrorism .
Second , namely counter-radicalization . Efforts prevention with the plan is carrying the process of planned , integrated , systematic , and sustainable are done against people and groups are vulnerable to exposure to radicalism . The goal is to stop the spread of understanding of radical terrorism . Activity kontraradikalisasi This will be implemented by directly or not directly through kontrapropaganda , kontranarasi , and kontraideologi .
Its third is the de-radicalization which adheres to the process in a planned , integrated , systematic , and continuous that practiced in order to eliminate , suppress , to reverse the understanding of radical terrorism . Target deradicalised generally is suspected , convicted , defendants or convicts , including former prisoners of terrorism or people or groups of people who have been exposed to understand radical terrorism .
According to Lecturer in the Department of Sociology , University of Gadjah Mada , Zaki Arrobi stated if the issue of the most fundamental that the perpetrators of radicalism faced in the past , is the failure of communication with the parents , relations of gender in the family , including the construction that is not equal important to diatensikan .
Things That which then glorify or mengglorifikasi use of a weapon , force up the value – the value that gives the situation is conducive to violence and terrorism . So from that , Zaki agreed in efforts to de-radicalization by touching dimension that is comprehensive and in terms of holistic . Deradicalization will be considered more effective if the emotional and human touch in daily life is carried out .
Dimensions thought a former terrorist , is part of the heaviest to be touched . So it requires a persuasive approach in the long run . He added , related to the history of life , reason and motivation of the main perpetrators of radicalism decided to join the movement of terrorism certainly different . So the approach formula can not be made uniform or one for all .
It is certain that all things will definitely start with the family . Education tolerate high rated as the key principal to appreciate a difference . Which eventually will provide views of the shade of the difference sharply with respect to religion, opinions , attitudes and sectors of the other .
However , now the cultivation of tolerance seems to drift along with the swift development of the times. Up to make the perpetrators wanted to make her world alone accordance expectations are desired . Increase vigilance will be exposure to radicalism it can begin from themselves alone and families . Strengthen faith and insights related to radicalism so that we can fight the understanding that is now increasingly undermining people’s thinking .
* The writer is an activist of the motherland media