Ultimate magazine theme for WordPress.

Delegitimizing KPU’s Efforts and Cheating Ways to Thwart Election Results?

353

By: Chess Sastranegara )*

Generalization efforts on cases of fraud, as well as the swift campaign of protest and rejection of election results were delegitimation efforts of the organizers. In addition, it is a tendentious attitude that contradicts democracy by not trusting the KPU as a credible institution.

Regarding the polemic of the provisional results of the vote, especially for candidate pairs 01 who received significant votes above the challenger, of course the public can witness publications directly through kridebel media, because during the real count the KPU has carried out openly and even accessible to anyone passing official website election2019.kpu.go.id. That is, the KPU has been on the right path by carrying out the process openly, but there are still negative accusations that actually the efforts of certain parties which aim to delegitimize the results of official KPU calculations, so that the KPU is expected to lose the trust of the public ) Even though the KPU has been maximal in presenting a fair and open and transparent electoral process. Therefore, all parties should appreciate the ongoing process.

Now I am trying to analyze the relevance of the 2018 Congo election with the effort to delegitimize the KPU. If in the Election of Congo, the KPU’s logistics warehouse was burned before the election was held, between the opposition and the Government blamed each other, while in Indonesia the KPU logistics warehouse burned down after voting, while the KPU’s vote count was not finished. It is not yet known what caused the KPU warehouse in West Sumatra to burn, whether there was a burn or because of something or something else. This is also what will cause confusion over the results of the General Election.

The effort to delegitimize the KPU has been seen since the beginning of the General Election was held, allegations against the KPU server that was set to win the candidate pair 01 were also rolled out. Long before that, news was found that scattered ballots of ballots, while the KPU had not printed ballots. Also hoaks 7 Containers of ballots that have been shot at the port of the pot of cape. After the voting, the KPU’s website was hacked by communist Chinese hackers, even though it was a hoax.

The effort to delegitimize the KPU is also an effort to delegitimize the results of the 2019 Election. It is proven that there has been a discourse so that the 2019 Election will be repeated. This is very unreasonable, imagine how many more countries must spend the budget for re-election. It should be if there is a dispute, just finish it at the Constitutional Court, not even bring their own selfishness, because only they are not ready to lose or just want to win.

There was no attempt to resolve all forms of disputes over the results of the vote count, constitutionally, as stipulated by the Election Law, faction 02 which had the early Declaration of its President as the Winner of the Presidential Election, while the KPU had not announced the results. Just like the elections in Congo, too, so people are made confused. This situation will cause friction in the community if it is not quickly suppressed. The faction 02 insisted on being the winner, only on the basis of internal vote counting which until now did not want to refer to the data and mechanism, which became strange and questioned by many parties. Only provocative narratives continue to be built on the main media, social media.

If only each party respected the applicable rules and laws, this dispute could be resolved at the Constitutional Court. Because the regulatory mechanism that applies in the Election Law is indeed like that. But it seems that faction 02 does not want to follow the constitutional mechanism, just because it feels cheated. Should there be fraud, it must be proven jointly, not only on the statement of one party, and vice versa, the truth must also be acknowledged by both parties, not just one party but the mechanism must still be constitutional rather than slander and provocative unconstitutional.

If the leaders of the 02 strongholds themselves cannot respect the rules, how can their supporters be orderly towards the rules. In the future in the implementation of our country, it will be difficult to discipline the community to obey the rules, because the leaders themselves do not set a good example. Jokowi had sent his envoy to meet Prabowo, but it didn’t seem to work. While the FPI High Priest, Rizieq Shihab, appealed to the Prabowo-Sandi camp, not to make certain deals with the Jokowi-Ma’ruf camp. It seems that there are indeed parties who want chaos due to the implementation of the 2019 Election. Elections are only used as an entrance to create riots. With the mass riots, they will enter to add to the chaos.

This is what the security apparatus must anticipate, as our society does not need to be provoked to fight, if we do it, only what happens is our own loss. Those who want the opportunity will applaud. Let us reject the efforts to delegate the 2019 Election to both the hearers and the official results. Hopefully the community can clearly assess and conclude what is happening now. let’s save our democracy for the progress of the nation.

)* Blogger – Student of Paramadina University

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.